Re: ipngwg, please stop the insanity

To: "Zoch, Richard (TIFS)" <Richard.Zoch at guarantygroup.com>
Subject: Re: ipngwg, please stop the insanity
From: Bob Hinden <hinden at iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:35:57 -0800
Cc: "'ietf at ietf.org'" <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <A967CB641939D511B60D00D0B746F170048AC87C@FAUSS022>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Richard,

The ipng mailing list is working.  It is used by the working group to
develop the IPv6 protocol, but it is not used to debate the need for
IPv6.  To me the IETF list is an appropriate place for that debate.

Bob

At 12:30 PM 11/29/2001, Zoch, Richard (TIFS) wrote:

Is majordomo/ipng at sunroof.eng.sun.com broken?
Is there no longer an "appropriate e-mail venue" for ipngwg?

References:
- ipngwg, please stop the insanity
  - From: Zoch, Richard (TIFS)

Prev by Date: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
Next by Date: Re: Cable Co's view: NAT is bad because we want to charge per IP
Previous by thread: ipngwg, please stop the insanity
Next by thread: about radius
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ipngwg, please stop the insanity

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.