RE: Why IPv6 is a must?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Why IPv6 is a must?

To: "J. Noel Chiappa" <jnc at ginger.lcs.mit.edu>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Why IPv6 is a must?
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf at tndh.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:18:45 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200111301936.OAA24525@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I hadn't realized the registries
> were trying to guard against routing table bloat as well as 
> address space
> exhaustion. I'm curious, when did this start, and how was it decided?

Miss a few meetings and all kinds of things start happening.... :)

References:
- Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
  - From: J. Noel Chiappa

Prev by Date: Re: Cable modem spec(s) sites - lookie here
Next by Date: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
Previous by thread: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
Next by thread: Re: Why IPv6 is a must?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.