Re: What is at stake?

To: Michael Hammer <mhammer at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: What is at stake?
From: vint cerf <vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:11:05 -0500
Cc: Michael StJohns <mstjohns at mindspring.com>, Ari Ollikainen <Ari at OLTECO.com>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020124110238.00b627e8@cia.cisco.com>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020124083515.026ec200@shoe.reston.mci.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020123221758.02ce8488@pop.mindspring.com> <v04210119b8754258a872@[192.168.0.10]> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

yes - Phone Net (University of Delaware developed) and the Telenet (X.25)

vint

At 11:03 AM 1/24/2002 -0500, Michael Hammer wrote:
>Quick question:  Could one university communicate to another university without going through the ARPANET?
>
>Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Bill Manning
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Tony Hansen

References:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ari Ollikainen
- What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Michael Hammer

Prev by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Next by Date: Re: of control and frogs, Re: What is at stake?
Previous by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Next by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: What is at stake?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.