RE: What is at stake?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: What is at stake?

To: "vint cerf" <vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>, "Michael Hammer" <mhammer at cisco.com>
Subject: RE: What is at stake?
From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema at windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:19:12 -0800
Cc: "Michael StJohns" <mstjohns at mindspring.com>, "Ari Ollikainen" <Ari at OLTECO.com>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcGk+jp69x+NaSReRu+Bpr/eNk5twQAATxEQ
Thread-topic: What is at stake?

As well as a number of gateways using UUCP, BITNET or even X.400...

> From: vint cerf [mailto:vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com]
> 
> yes - Phone Net (University of Delaware developed) and the Telenet
(X.25)
> 
> vint
> 
> At 11:03 AM 1/24/2002 -0500, Michael Hammer wrote:
> >Quick question:  Could one university communicate to another
university
> without going through the ARPANET?
> >
> >Mike

Prev by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Next by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Previous by thread: practical proposal -- Re: What is at stake?
Next by thread: RE: What is at stake?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.