Re: What is at stake?

To: vint cerf <vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>
Subject: Re: What is at stake?
From: Bill Manning <bmanning at isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:25:08 -0800
Cc: Michael Hammer <mhammer at cisco.com>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns at mindspring.com>, Ari Ollikainen <Ari at OLTECO.com>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.2.20020124111046.02762dd8@shoe.reston.mci.net>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020124083515.026ec200@shoe.reston.mci.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020123221758.02ce8488@pop.mindspring.com> <v04210119b8754258a872@[192.168.0.10]> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20020124111046.02762dd8@shoe.reston.mci.net>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

 BITnet played a part also, though it was a later on.



On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:11:05AM -0500, vint cerf wrote:
> yes - Phone Net (University of Delaware developed) and the Telenet (X.25)
> 
> vint
> 
> At 11:03 AM 1/24/2002 -0500, Michael Hammer wrote:
> >Quick question:  Could one university communicate to another university without going through the ARPANET?
> >
> >Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck

References:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ari Ollikainen
- What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: vint cerf

Prev by Date: RE: What is at stake?
Next by Date: Re: off-list, Re: IAB/ISOC not IETF Charter Re: What is at stake? Re: IP: Microsoft breaks Mime specification
Previous by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Next by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: What is at stake?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.