Re: What is at stake?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What is at stake?

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: What is at stake?
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:03:09 -0500
Cc: Ed Gerck <egerck at nma.com>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:26:53 PST." <5.1.0.14.2.20020124122533.03031ea8@127.0.0.1>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> There have now been multiple postings that explained how reality was
> substantially different than you have been claiming.
> 
> As a consequence, actual history does not support your conclusion.
> 
> In other words, Ed, the Internet does not have the problem that you are so
> tenaciously promoting.

no, it doesn't follow.  it follows only that Ed has failed to demonstrate
the problem.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck

References:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Next by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Previous by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Next by thread: Re: What is at stake?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.