Re: What is at stake?

[Lloyd Wood <l.wood at eim.surrey.ac.uk>]

Dave Crocker wrote:

> There have now been multiple postings that explained how reality was
> substantially different than you have been claiming.
>
> As a consequence, actual history does not support your conclusion.
>
> In other words, Ed, the Internet does not have the problem that you
> are so tenaciously promoting.

A syllogism has three parts. But that's about all it has in common
with your statements above.

L.

<L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>