Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?

To: "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?
From: grenville armitage <gja at ureach.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:16:32 +1100
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020124083515.026ec200@shoe.reston.mci.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020123221758.02ce8488@pop.mindspring.com> <v04210119b8754258a872@[192.168.0.10]> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com> <3C4F7725.69ABFF72@nma.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20020124111046.02762dd8@shoe.reston.mci.net> <20020124172508.GA61677@zed.isi.edu> <3C5066CF.537E74DB@nma.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Ed Gerck wrote:
	[..]
> Even though it was so gradual that it was  almost
> unnoticeable,

Almost unnoticeable to whom?

gja

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Einar Stefferud

References:
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ari Ollikainen
- What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: vint cerf
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Bill Manning
- Re: What is at stake?
  - From: Ed Gerck

Prev by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Next by Date: Re: What is at stake?
Previous by thread: RE: What is at stake?
Next by thread: Re: Perceptions... Re: What is at stake?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.