Re: I-D ACTION:draft-etal-ietf-analysis-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-etal-ietf-analysis-00.txt



John Stracke wrote:
And the authors do caution that their numbers are blind to the quality of the RFCs. Their point, though, is that looking at the easy metrics is better than not measuring anything at all;

Wrong information is worse than no information. If the results don't mean anything, why measure?


Lars
--
Lars Eggert <larse at isi.edu>               Information Sciences Institute
http://www.isi.edu/larse/              University of Southern California

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.