Re: ssl

To: Bill Cunningham <billcu at citynet.net>
Subject: Re: ssl
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 01:38:14 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 2002 01:04:10 EDT." <000701c1f3f2$4bbd0ac0$2344903f@a>
References: <000701c1f3f2$4bbd0ac0$2344903f@a>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Sun, 05 May 2002 01:04:10 EDT, Bill Cunningham <billcu at citynet.net>  said:
> Is there a rfc for secure socket layer?
 
RFC2246 on TLS? Or you looking specifically for SSL instead?  I believe
that was a Netscape spec rather than an IETF one, but I may be mistaken
(although 2246 says this:

3. Goals of this document

   This document and the TLS protocol itself are based on the SSL 3.0
   Protocol Specification as published by Netscape. The differences
   between this protocol and SSL 3.0 are not dramatic, but they are
   significant enough that TLS 1.0 and SSL 3.0 do not interoperate
   (although TLS 1.0 does incorporate a mechanism by which a TLS
   implementation can back down to SSL 3.0). This document is intended

Hope that helps...

				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

References:
- ssl
  - From: Bill Cunningham

Prev by Date: ssl
Next by Date: Re: How many standards or protocols...
Previous by thread: ssl
Next by thread: Re: ssl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ssl

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.