Re: IETF 54 calendar

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF 54 calendar

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>, Pete Resnick <presnick at qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 54 calendar
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 18:14:44 +0200
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.2.2.20020528083023.01b8fdf0@jay.songbird.com>
References: <5.1.1.2.2.20020528083023.01b8fdf0@jay.songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

there's a reason POISSON has lately avoided having physical meetings unless it absolutely had to....

--On 28. mai 2002 08:30 -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net> wrote:

At 03:32 PM 5/26/2002 -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
It seems to me that exactly the same thing can be said about POISSON and
it gets along just fine conflicting with other meetings.
excellent observation.

References:
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: IETF 54 calendar
Next by Date: Re: IETF 54 calendar
Previous by thread: Re: IETF 54 calendar
Next by thread: Re: IETF 54 calendar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.