Re: IPR at IETF 54

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPR at IETF 54
From: Scott Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:20:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020529210734.04317ec0@joy.songbird.com>; from GK@ninebynine.org on Wed, May 29, 2002 at 09:10:20PM +0100
Mail-followup-to: Scott Brim <sbrim at cisco.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <3CF4996F.C500D367@hursley.ibm.com> <28236589.1022597410@localhost> <p05111a05b916f42fb18b@[216.43.25.67]> <28236589.1022597410@localhost> <5.1.0.14.0.20020528172456.00aa44d0@localhost> <5.1.1.2.2.20020529084337.030722b0@jay.songbird.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020529210734.04317ec0@joy.songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, May 29, 2002 09:10:20PM +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
> How do we best approach the design of Internet technologies so that 
> IPR-related obstructions to their deployment will be minimized?

That assumes IPR-related goals are obstructions.  For me they're a pain
but I've been burned so I have no problem with people, including me,
protecting themselves.  Let's start one step back.  How can we best
approach the process of building and running the Internet to minimize
conflict between technology goals and IPR-related goals?

..Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Randy Bush

References:
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 54 calendar
  - From: Dave Crocker
- IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Graham Klyne

Prev by Date: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Next by Date: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Previous by thread: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Next by thread: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPR at IETF 54

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.