Re: IPR at IETF 54

To: Robert Elz <kre at munnari.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: IPR at IETF 54
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 11:48:24 -0400
Cc: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 May 2002 22:34:06 +0700." <4393.1022859246@munnari.OZ.AU>
References: <200205311303.g4VD3hl0003054@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <5.1.0.14.2.20020530230656.02c2f690@jay.songbird.com> <D6A2BC3A-73DD-11D6-98D0-00039357A82A@extremenetworks.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020530094144.00a68590@localhost> <D6A2BC3A-73DD-11D6-98D0-00039357A82A@extremenetworks.com> <1560.1022836187@munnari.OZ.AU> <4393.1022859246@munnari.OZ.AU>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Fri, 31 May 2002 22:34:06 +0700, Robert Elz said:

> Yes, that's true - but it would be even easier if the new one were a
> full standard (even if the old one was too).

How would that work (having 2 full standards for the same exact thing)?

Attachment: pgpskQCuiispk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: RJ Atkinson
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: IPR at IETF 54
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Next by Date: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Previous by thread: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Next by thread: Re: IPR at IETF 54
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IPR at IETF 54

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.