![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 23:09:09 PDT, Peter Deutsch said: > You don't need a unique root if you're willing to relax the prior > constraint that you absolutely must prevent name conflicts. I know that > voicing this idea is considered an indictable (if not excommuncable) > offense to many folks in this community, but frankly the prospect of > such collisions as an alternative to the current mess just doesn't seem > to me to be such a horrible alternative. I'm sure you'd be pleased if half the replies to your mail bounced because there's no 'pdeutsch' at the OTHER earthlink.net. Of course, your mail to keydist at cafax.se probably bounced too, as did isdf at isoc.org, because you got the "wrong" versions of each, and wanted to send to the OTHER one. 25% of the URLs mailed to you wouldn't point to anything in YOUR DNS. Of course, typosquatters would love not having to wait for people to make a typo.... But hey - if you think it's preferable to the current mess (which is mostly political rather than technical), just remember that it's usually unwise to use a technical solution for a social problem.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
pgpmo9u8pjDB6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.