RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard

["COLES, RICHARD J. (JSC-EV) (LM)" <richard.j.coles1 at jsc.nasa.gov>]

Sorry for the misquote.

Sometimes it's hard to tell who said what in these multi-response messages.
Even editing the msg does not always help.

I just wanted to be sure that everyone knew how important FAX is to NASA
(and, I suppose, to other agencies of the Federal government).

Tnx/RJC


-----Original Message-----
From: ned.freed at mrochek.com [mailto:ned.freed at mrochek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 11:24 AM
To: COLES, RICHARD J. (JSC-EV) (LM)
Cc: ietf-fax at imc.org; ietf at ietf.org
Subject: RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation
toProposed Standard


> Ned "sed":

> > ...fax is dead technology, who cares???

> FAX is NOT dead at NASA.

Actually, I never said anything of the kind, nor did I agree with any such
statement. Robert Elz said this. My response was merely that even if you
believe this is true the current proposal may still be of importance since
it
has utility outside of the FAX space.

				Ned