Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard

Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard

To: ned.freed at mrochek.com
Subject: Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists at ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 21:11:33 +0100
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, ietf-fax at IMC.ORG
In-reply-to: <01KJNL06HJR0001ZTY@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <"Your message dated Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:56:02 -0400" <200207031656.g63Gu2226331@astro.cs.utk.edu> <01KJNJF5CAEK001ZTY@mauve.mrochek.com> <200207031656.g63Gu2226331@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 10:12 AM 7/3/02 -0700, ned.freed at mrochek.com wrote:

Language preferences are, I believe, already defined as something you can get
out of feature algebra.


Yup.  RFC 2987.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK at NineByNine.org>

References:
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard
  - From: ned . freed
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard
  - From: ned . freed

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.