Re: E-bone collapse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: E-bone collapse

To: Dominic Pinto <dominic.pinto at ieee.org>
Subject: Re: E-bone collapse
From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood at EIM.SURREY.AC.UK>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:38:41 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Bill Cunningham <billcu at citynet.net>, <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <3D2E814B.1DAC4F20@ieee.org>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-to: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at EIM.SURREY.AC.UK>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Dominic Pinto wrote:

> JANET doesn't seem to have any problems:
> http://www.ukerna.ac.uk/awareness/teleglobe.html

Transitioning from the doomed Teleglobe and KPNQwest to the doomed
Worldcom has to be something of a masterstroke.

L.

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: E-bone collapse
  - From: Rob Evans
- Re: E-bone collapse
  - From: Dominic Pinto

References:
- Re: E-bone collapse
  - From: Dominic Pinto

Prev by Date: 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility
Next by Date: Re: E-bone collapse
Previous by thread: Re: E-bone collapse
Next by thread: Re: E-bone collapse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.