Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?

To: Michael Mealling <michael at neonym.net>
Subject: Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:35:08 -0400
Cc: "Clark C . Evans" <cce at clarkevans.com>, ietf at ietf.org, yaml-core at lists.sourceforge.net
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:07:19 EDT.") <20020725120719.G1825@bailey.dscga.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

ick.  please don't embed URIs in URNs.  that will just tempt people
to use the embedded URIs and not treat them as URNs.

I can see wanting to have a URN that's based on DNS, but there shouldn't
be any expectation that you can derive a URI from the URN just by 
modifying the syntax.  that defeats the whole purpose.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
  - From: Clark C . Evans

References:
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
  - From: Michael Mealling

Prev by Date: Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
Next by Date: Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
Previous by thread: Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
Next by thread: Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.