Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root

To: ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:31:02 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:16:40 PDT." <5.1.1.2.2.20020801100523.037a7278@jay.songbird.com>
References: <3D45BE4A.99D13DC4@nma.com> <20020729184335.3A89ED287@ns1.vrx.net> <3D45BE4A.99D13DC4@nma.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020801003243.03626f68@jay.songbird.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020801100523.037a7278@jay.songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:16:40 PDT, Dave Crocker said:
> 2.  Note that Karl won the suit, but lost the war.  He is now subject to 
> the conditions that ICANN had originally wanted to apply for his 
> access.  The only difference is that now Karl is under a court order to 
> conform to those rules.

Ahh... that explains why an ICANN spokescreature said ICANN is considering
appealing the judgement.

Attachment: pgprRhUE5jB6F.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root
  - From: Ed Gerck
- Re: Trees have one root
  - From: Richard J. Sexton Ph.D. J.D.
- Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Next by Date: Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root)
Previous by thread: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Next by thread: Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.