Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...

To: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
From: Joe Baptista <baptista at dot-god.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 00:07:16 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>, "vinton g. cerf" <vinton.g.cerf at wcom.com>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.2.2.20020801192511.0318e7a8@jay.songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dave Crocker wrote:

> Given that nearly all the folks dealing with ICANN seem inclined either
> towards hyper-politics or hyper-criticism, what are the chances that 100%
> transparency will cripple what little is left of ICANN's ability to get any
> work done at all.  (Hint:  The answer is 100%)

sounds broken.

References:
- Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Let's read what the court said rather than imagine Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Next by Date: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Previous by thread: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Next by thread: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.