![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Caitlin asked:
However, isn't this a political discussion?
The technical issues are whether you can have a single name space without a single algorithm/authority for resolving conflicts, and the mechanism(s) for distributing that information.
Debating the first point quickly resembles discussions of square circles and perpetual motion machines. Everytime it is pointed out that the lack of a single algorithm/authority would mean that there was no longer a single name space the topic shifts and has a tendency to focus on the *identity* of those currently in charge of that namespace.
All of which is irrelevant.
I would suggest that those who believe ICANN is a problem should spend their time writing their congressisonal representatives. It is not a technical issue.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.