Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...




	> In other words, does it matter that the only real public activity that
	> folks participate in with ICANN is to attack it.


Yes it matters.  That's the crux of the essense.

Word for the day:  "legitimacy".


	> Given that nearly all the folks dealing with ICANN seem inclined either
	> towards hyper-politics or hyper-criticism, what are the chances that 100%
	> transparency will cripple what little is left of ICANN's ability to get any
	> work done at all.  (Hint:  The answer is 100%)


Bummer.


-t





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.