Re: Unified RFC Protocol...

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Unified RFC Protocol...
From: John Stracke <jstracke at centivinc.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:05:14 -0400
Organization: Centiv
References: <3.0.6.32.20020801175524.00a827d8@mail.shininglightpro.com> <13275905210.20020802164109@niist.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020512 Netscape/7.0b1

Timur Shemsedinov wrote:

 But unification of new protocols is good task

Yeah, but that's what BEEP's for--and we don't need *two* unification
protocols.  :-)

--
/================================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke at centivinc.com                       |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com                     |
|Centiv            |My opinions are my own.                      |
|================================================================|
|"What now, Brain?" "We should flee in terror. Yes, that would be|
|the wisest course."                                             |
\================================================================/

References:
- Unified RFC Protocol...
  - From: Thomas J. Hruska
- Re: Unified RFC Protocol...
  - From: Timur Shemsedinov

Prev by Date: Re: way out of the DNS problems? (former Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root)
Next by Date: Re: Correcting an incorrect assertion. Was: Re: delegation mechanism...
Previous by thread: Re: Unified RFC Protocol...
Next by thread: Re: Unified RFC Protocol...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Unified RFC Protocol...

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.