![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> ORSC is not doing any of this just to be disruptive and contrary. perhaps that is not ORSC's intent. but by promoting new TLDs that aren't usable everywhere, ORSC *is* being disruptive and contrary. in effect it is saying "ICANN doesn't function the way *we* want it to, it is okay for us to disrupt applications that depend on consistent behavior of DNS". that's not socially responsible behavior. nor does ICANN's behavior excuse ORSC's. Keith
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.