Re: Why spam is a problem.

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: Why spam is a problem.
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall at ehsco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:09:09 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
References: <200208132354.g7DNsRf00657@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721

on 8/13/2002 6:54 PM Keith Moore wrote:
>>Extending the TCPA to include unsolicited commercial mail is our best
>>collective hope at slowing down spam in the short term, 
> 
> yeah, like it's really going to stop the spam coming from Korea. 

operative use of "short term", we need to sweep our own porch first

> as for going after the beneficiaries - so if I don't like Femtosoft,
> can I spam on their behalf so that they'll be fined?

Keith, if you're willing to face civil and/or criminal charges, there's no
limit to what you can do

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

References:
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Why People Should NOT Depend on "Root Servers"
Next by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Previous by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Next by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Why spam is a problem.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.