Re: Why spam is a problem.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why spam is a problem.

To: Christopher Evans <teknopup at bigvalley.net>
Subject: Re: Why spam is a problem.
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 23:03:55 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:14:11 -0800.") <HGGBC9JI0YVD8IFUSUQHFDC1W4W75.3d59a0d3@www>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> yeah okay, so I am wrong.   i was thinking of the spams i get from @hotmail.com
> that dont even seem to exist.

you're not wrong - checking the return address for validity does cut down on spam.
it's just trickier than it seems to do it in a way that doesn't also block legit mail.

Keith

References:
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Christopher Evans

Prev by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Next by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Previous by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Next by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.