Re: Why spam is a problem.

To: sommerfeld at orchard.arlington.ma.us
Subject: Re: Why spam is a problem.
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 21:09:04 -0700
Cc: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, "Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200208140311.g7E3B2s04573@syn.hamachi.org>
References: <Message from Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu> <200208131923.g7DJN4f29288@astro.cs.utk.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 11:11 PM 8/13/2002 -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

Now, lobby for the creation of laws which subjects someone who sends
spam despite the "no soliciting" sign to a significant fine
($1000.00/message?), payable to the recipient.


how does this help with the massive amount of international spam?

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

References:
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

Prev by Date: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.
Next by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Previous by thread: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.
Next by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Why spam is a problem.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.