Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.

To: IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.
From: Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:25:07 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <00a101c24381$886a3860$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References: <F66A04C29AD9034A8205949AD0C9010401C0E5EA@win-msg-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <87u1lyu29l.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <00a101c24381$886a3860$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:58:31 +0200 Anthony Atkielski <anthony at atkielski.com> wrote:

> Perry writes:

> > What happened to Usenet will indeed
> > happen to SMTP if we do not stop pretending
> > that the problem is insignificant.
 
> What happened to Usenet?  Still seems fine to me.

automated spam cancellers.

richard
--
Richard Welty                                         rwelty at averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking                                         518-573-7592
              Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security

References:
- RE: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Christian Huitema
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Why spam is a problem.
  - From: Anthony Atkielski

Prev by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Next by Date: Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.
Previous by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Next by thread: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re[2]: Why spam is a problem.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.