Re: Why Spam is a problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Spam is a problem



Yo Bill!

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Bill Cunningham wrote:

> Is an annualized rate of 55,000 spams a year, sustainable for a year?

Every table and graph I have seen has shown exponential growth.  My own
logs show exponential growth.  However bad it may actually be for you
or me it will be much worse later this year.

Only one thing may slow the growth.  I find a lot of customers no longer using
email at all.  This trend is accelerating.  People have moved over to the
instant messaging world where spam seems to be more under control.

Just like a virus may kill itslef by killing the host, the spammers may
limit their business by killing off email users.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.