Re: Why Spam is a problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Spam is a problem

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Why Spam is a problem
From: Frank Solensky <fsolensky at premonitia.com>
Date: 16 Aug 2002 13:27:49 -0400
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Just posted on slashdot: a Bayesian approach to the problem that reports
to have rates of 0.5% on false positives and 0% false negative:

http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html

				-- Frank

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Spam is a problem
  - From: David Morris
- Re: Why Spam is a problem
  - From: Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Why Spam is a problem
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Why Spam is a problem
  - From: stanislav shalunov

Prev by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Previous by thread: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by thread: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.