Re: One SPAM side effect

To: Bob Braden <braden at isi.edu>
Subject: Re: One SPAM side effect
From: Aaron Falk <falk at isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:33:10 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200208161935.TAA29779@gra.isi.edu>; from braden@ISI.EDU on Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 07:35:40PM +0000
Mail-followup-to: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <200208161935.TAA29779@gra.isi.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Bob Braden wrote:
> 
> Needless to say, the RFC Editor's site did NOT wish to do a peptide or
> amindo acid search, but it was very persistant in NOT wishing to.
> Nor did the ETH folks REALLY want to look up an RFC, but they were
> equally persistant in not doing so.
> 

The consequences of such behavior are thoroughly documented in
"The Forbin Project" (http://us.imdb.com/Plot?0064177).  ;)

--aaron

References:
- One SPAM side effect
  - From: Bob Braden

Prev by Date: Re: One SPAM side effect
Next by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Previous by thread: Re: One SPAM side effect
Next by thread: Re: One SPAM side effect
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: One SPAM side effect

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.