Re: Why Spam is a problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why Spam is a problem



Perry E. Metzger wrote:

John Stracke <jstracke at centivinc.com> writes:


Mmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches.  It'd be much
more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the
recipient's filters.

Are you kidding? They've been doing thing to explicitly evade filters
for years now. For example, ever notice groups of random characters at
the end of spam Subject: lines?


A spammer can claim that those there for legitimate technical reasons, to help them to track responses/bounces. Sending 1000 messages gets harder to justify.

--
/===========================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke at centivinc.com  |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com|
|Centiv            |My opinions are my own. |
|===========================================|
|"Who died and made you king?" "My father." |
\===========================================/






Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.