![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
John Stracke <jstracke at centivinc.com> writes:A spammer can claim that those there for legitimate technical reasons, to help them to track responses/bounces. Sending 1000 messages gets harder to justify.
Are you kidding? They've been doing thing to explicitly evade filtersMmm, but that pours gasoline on the villagers' torches. It'd be much more clearly a crime, since it's so obviously an attempt to evade the recipient's filters.
for years now. For example, ever notice groups of random characters at
the end of spam Subject: lines?
-- /===========================================\ |John Stracke |jstracke at centivinc.com | |Principal Engineer|http://www.centivinc.com| |Centiv |My opinions are my own. | |===========================================| |"Who died and made you king?" "My father." | \===========================================/
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.