Re: Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act

To: fred at cisco.com
Subject: Re: Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act
From: "Brian Bisaillon" <Brian.Bisaillon at mbs.gov.on.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:05:31 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

I'll provide the URL to the act so people can read it before they comment:
http://www.stoppoliceware.org/cbdtpa_bill_text.php

>>> "Fred Baker" <fred at cisco.com> 08/19/02 11:49AM >>>
At 10:48 AM 8/19/2002 -0400, Brian Bisaillon wrote:
>Legislations such as the "Consumer Broadband and Digital Television 
>Promotion Act" are deliberate attempts by the U.S. government to impose 
>patterns or systems that limit one's mind (one's ability to learn about 
>and use information). This is clearly a limit on one's freedom and it's 
>morally wrong.

So then commercial advertising is wrong as well? It surely has the same end 
in mind.

Prev by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem.
Previous by thread: Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act
Next by thread: Private Reply to Fred Baker... My Apology
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.