Re: Why Spam is a problem

Subject: Re: Why Spam is a problem
From: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall at ehsco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:31:05 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208190653290.6753-100000@egate.xpasc.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721

on 8/19/2002 9:57 AM David Morris wrote:

> Legislation must be crafted to make enforcement economical.

Clarification here. When we talk about 5c per recipient, we are talking
about economic solutions. When we talk about $500 per recipient in fines,
we are talking about punative (social) solutions.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/

References:
- Re: Why Spam is a problem
  - From: David Morris

Prev by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by Date: Re: writing congress about spam
Previous by thread: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by thread: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Why Spam is a problem

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.