Re: writing congress about spam

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: writing congress about spam

To: Richard Shockey <rshockey at ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: writing congress about spam
From: Fred Baker <fred at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:51:26 -0700
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020819233627.01e40c28@popd.ix.netcom.com>
References: <3D612C92.DDBE84D0@cisco.com> <3D5E8D9B.6010505@cisco.com> <001d01c24641$e87f4a70$0701a8c0.1775@dougpro>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 11:56 PM 8/19/2002 -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:

There is power in collective political action

There probably is. Care to set of a US-CENTRIC-SPAM-LAW-DISCUSSION at ix.netcom.org discussion list for it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: writing congress about spam
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre

References:
- Re: writing congress about spam
  - From: Dan Wing
- writing congress about spam
  - From: Eliot Lear
- Re: writing congress about spam
  - From: Richard Shockey

Prev by Date: Re: Why Spam is a problem
Next by Date: Re: Why spam is a problem
Previous by thread: RE: writing congress about spam
Next by thread: Re: writing congress about spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.