Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

To: william at ELAN.NET
Subject: Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 18:28:04 -0700
Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208201444590.5703-100000@sokol.elan.net>
References: <200208202156.g7KLurLm010888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 03:27 PM 8/20/2002 -0700, william at ELAN.NET wrote:

It it seriously not capable of handling what is needed, particularly any
kind of verification, callback, exchange of certificates, etc, etc.

No doubt you have a detailed list of functional requirements written somewhere, so that folks do not have to guess at what you are seeking to do (and why it needs to be done.)

So, please provide the URL to the document and then we might be able to consider your suggestion productively.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
  - From: william

References:
- Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
  - From: william

Prev by Date: 3:219 INFO....Mirrored Registry
Next by Date: Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
Previous by thread: Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
Next by thread: Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.