RE: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

To: "'Keith Moore'" <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: RE: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
From: Franck Martin <Franck at sopac.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:23:35 +1200
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, smtpng at smtpng.org
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Exactly, but please note the EXPERIMENTAL status and the date 1995.

Note also that it need to be cleaned up a little bit due to our current
experience of DOS and DDOS.

Also, in general on smtpng implementations, it will be easier to target
opensource software for testing than rely on vendors to make a move.

Cheers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 3:42 
To: Franck Martin
Cc: 'william at elan.net'; ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org 


> but you forgot one item in your list, re-negotiation of a transaction and
> re-starting where it was left, like http and ftp does.

you mean like RFC 1845?

Prev by Date: Re: MUST/SHOULD and related terminology
Next by Date: am i the only one...
Previous by thread: Re: MBone
Next by thread: am i the only one...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.