Re: Multihoming Issues

To: Sister Sibling <ccs522g9 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
From: Joe Abley <jabley at AUTOMAGIC.ORG>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:57:07 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, iesg at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20020830021621.91892.qmail@web12401.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20020830021621.91892.qmail@web12401.mail.yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 07:16:21PM -0700, Sister Sibling wrote:
> The IETF is recommending that the DNS mechanisms to support IPv6
> stay essentially the same as those already in use with IPv4 today.
> To our opinion, in the realm of multi-homed networks, the techniques
> used in IPv4 can't all be applied since they have scaling problems.
> Specifically, if the same prefix is advertised by multiple ISPs,
> the routing tables will grow as a function of the number of multihomed
> sites.

Could you clarify the relationship you see between multi-homing and
DNS in this context?

References:
- Multihoming Issues
  - From: Sister Sibling

Prev by Date: Re: Multihoming Issues
Next by Date: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
Previous by thread: Re: Multihoming Issues
Next by thread: Re: Multihoming Issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Multihoming Issues

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.