Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"

To: Gordon Cook <cook at cookreport.com>
Subject: Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
From: Carl Malamud <carl at media.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <p05111b0ab99565181efa@[209.92.60.106]>
Organization: Internet Multicasting Service, Inc.
Organization: media.org
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

> Hi Vint,
> 
> Carl Malamud has quite a lot to say about integrity at 
> http://not.invisible.net/signals/bin/000270.shtml
> 
> I'd say that engineering without integrity is a bit flawed wouldn't you?

The thing I hate the most about the entire ICANN process is the fact that 
problems with their process gets spun into personal attacks.  Vint's
got plenty of integrity, as do all the staff I've dealt with at ICANN.
We've got a problem with their process, but let's not turn that into
ad hominum attack.  Reasonable people can differ and discuss without
calling each other names or impuning their motives.

Regards,

Carl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
  - From: Gordon Cook

References:
- ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
  - From: Gordon Cook

Prev by Date: Re: frequency analysis
Next by Date: Re: frequency analysis
Previous by thread: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
Next by thread: Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.