Re: Multihoming Issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multihoming Issues

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Multihoming Issues
From: Caitlin Bestler <caitlinb at rp.asomi.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 16:39:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <010501c25415$a6705020$8c56fea9@repligate>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

On 9/4/02, Jim Fleming wrote:

>From: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian at hursley.ibm.com>
>> Could we switch this thread to where it belongs (the
>> multi6 WG)?
>=============================
>
>Would it not be more appropriate on an IPv6-based network ?
>Why would IPv4 users (here) care about A6 ?
>

Does that mean that you believe "IPv8" should only be
discussed on "IPv8" networks?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multihoming Issues
  - From: Jim Fleming
- Re: Multihoming Issues
  - From: Jim Fleming

References:
- Re: Multihoming Issues
  - From: Jim Fleming

Prev by Date: RE: DNS
Next by Date: Re: Multihoming Issues
Previous by thread: Re: Multihoming Issues
Next by thread: Re: Multihoming Issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.