![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Gary E. Miller wrote:...
Barring that, please name ONE switch, or cite ONE credible reference source, where arpspoofing is prevented at the switch by any means short of harcoding the MACs.
Practical != economical. Further, there are MACs which are hardcoded (i.e. to prevent overwrite of MAC addresses).
PS - as I also raised on private email earlier, some ISPs definitely hardcode which MAC can attach to a port (i.e., they lock on the first one that gets there, and prevent subsequent ones until there's an override).
Specific case: Santa Barbara, Cox ISP.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.