Re: TCP/IP Terms

To: vcerf at mci.net, "Bill Cunningham" <billcu at CITYNET.NET>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Terms
From: Christopher Evans <teknopup at bigvalley.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:02:00 -0800
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <000701c26680$8e090cc0$1544903f@a>
Organization: http://digitalatoll.flnet.org/
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

datagram is confuse..   well best i understand is the whole stack layers all rolled 
into one logical grouping.


9/27/02 3:49:32 PM, "Bill Cunningham" <billcu at CITYNET.NET> wrote:

>Vint,
>    Some of us at IETF are thinking about a draft to clear up some
>terminology about the different layers of TCP/IP.
>Whether it be packet, datagram, segement (more clearly defined) or whatever
>the case. Do you have any opinions on this?
>
>

References:
- TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Bill Cunningham

Prev by Date: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Next by Date: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Next by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TCP/IP Terms

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.