Re: TCP/IP Terms

To: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Terms
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:18:51 -0700
Cc: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>, vcerf at mci.net, billcu at CITYNET.NET, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200209282215.g8SMFS6E014068@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <Your message of "Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:37:33 PDT." <5.1.1.2.2.20020928103233.01ebd828@jay.songbird.com> <5.1.1.2.2.20020928103233.01ebd828@jay.songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 06:15 PM 9/28/2002 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

We're the *INTERNET* Engineering Task Force. The few places where traffic

ABNF has larger application. There is nothing about it that is specific to the TCP/IP suite.

The same potential exists for an effort to produce an independent volume of formal definitions.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850

References:
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks

Prev by Date: Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
Next by Date: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Next by thread: TCP/IP Terms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TCP/IP Terms

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.