Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)

To: Lixia Zhang <lixia at CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:03:40 +0859 ()
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <B9BB8780.1AD57%lixia@cs.ucla.edu> from Lixia Zhang at "Sep 28, 2002 04:21:20 pm"
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Lixia;

> >> RSVP establishes the per-flow state before the packets can flow.
> 
> I missed Ohta Son's original post, thanks to Valdis for catching this
> incorrect statement.
> 
> IP packets can flow anytime.

Fixing your statement:

	IP packets can be forwarded anytime.

To say "flow" on packets not on flows is incorrect.

							Masataka Ohta

References:
- Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
  - From: Lixia Zhang

Prev by Date: TCP/IP Terms
Next by Date: Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
Previous by thread: Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
Next by thread: Re: Datagram? Packet? (was : APEX)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.