Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt

To: Robert Elz <kre at munnari.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:36:16 +0200
Cc: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3 at torque.pothole.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <23838.1032845786@munnari.OZ.AU> (Robert Elz's message of "Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:36:26 +0700")
Mail-followup-to: Robert Elz <kre at munnari.OZ.AU>, Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3 at torque.pothole.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209231438210.2872-100000@netbusters.com> <23838.1032845786@munnari.OZ.AU>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

Robert Elz <kre at munnari.OZ.AU> writes:

> That wasn't done here, so the "officially withdrawn it" really can only be
> interpreted as "the authors are no longer pushing this doc".

The authors stopped pushing this document _only in the IETF context_.
However, the document is usually referenced by its
http://www.ietf.org/ URL. I think that's why the situation is so
confusing.

References:
- Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
  - From: Donald Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Report on Peering and Transit Economics (etc)
Next by Date: RE: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.