Re: TCP/IP Terms

To: "Michel Py" <michel at ARNEILL-PY.SACRAMENTO.CA.US>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Terms
From: "Bill Cunningham" <billcu at citynet.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:54:23 -0400
References: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B04640BD113@server2000>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel Py" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
To: "Bill Cunningham" <billcu at CITYNET.NET>; <ietf at ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: TCP/IP Terms


> Bill,
>
> > Bill Cunningham wrote:
> > I think the main goal is to compete with
> > OSI's much more defined model.
>
> What's wrong with the OSI model?
>
> Michel.

In and of itself, nothing. But it's not the Internet's true roots, and I
don't think it works as well for the net's architecture.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- RE: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Michel Py

Prev by Date: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Next by Date: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: RE: TCP/IP Terms
Next by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TCP/IP Terms

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.