Re: TCP/IP Terms

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: TCP/IP Terms
From: Ari Ollikainen <Ari at OLTECO.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:46:44 -0700
In-reply-to: <3D98B448.6040408@isi.edu>
References: <2B81403386729140A3A899A8B39B04640BD113@server2000> <001e01c268b2$cb4bb900$5644903f@a> <3D98B448.6040408@isi.edu>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

At 1:30 PM -0700 9/30/02, Joe Touch wrote:

Bill Cunningham wrote:
I think the main goal is to compete with
OSI's much more defined model.

What's wrong with the OSI model?


See Padlipsky's "Elements of Network Style", again available in print.
It's as relevent now as it was when it was written in 1984:
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?isbn=0%2D595%2D08879%2D1


	Or, at the very least, read RFC 871 ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Graham Klyne
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Bill Cunningham

References:
- RE: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Michel Py
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: TCP/IP Terms
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: RE: Report on Peering and Transit Economics (etc)
Next by Date: RE: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Next by thread: Re: TCP/IP Terms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: TCP/IP Terms

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.