RE: APEX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: APEX

To: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Subject: RE: APEX
From: "Michel Py" <michel at ARNEILL-PY.SACRAMENTO.CA.US>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:41:11 -0700
Cc: "Bill Cunningham" <billcu at CITYNET.NET>, <ietf at ietf.org>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcJjXnBaDcnR27Z3St6fhk7E8b7JkQFe4ksQ
Thread-topic: APEX

Dave,

Could you share what motivated the choice of the word "datagram" for
APEX? What puzzles me is that APEX rides on top of TCP, a
connection-oriented protocol. APEX might be stateless, but if it rides
on top of TCP how could you call it connectionless (which would be why
one uses the word "datagram") ?

Thanks
Michel.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APEX
  - From: Bill Cunningham

Prev by Date: RE: TCP/IP Terms
Next by Date: RE: TCP/IP Terms
Previous by thread: Re: APEX
Next by thread: Re: APEX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.