Re[2]: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard

To: Ward Harold <wharold at us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
From: Timur Shemsedinov <Timur at NIIST.NTU-KPI.KIEV.UA>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:38:47 +0300
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, jstracke at centivinc.com
In-reply-to: <OF088ED4C8.B0FA782F-ON87256C4E.005EF00A@us.ibm.com>
Organization: niist
References: <OF088ED4C8.B0FA782F-ON87256C4E.005EF00A@us.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Timur Shemsedinov <Timur at NIIST.NTU-KPI.KIEV.UA>
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

Ward,
thanks for explanations and references. I have one more question.
XMLRPC is similar to SOAP in abilities and applications,
as I understand. But on my personal opinion, if to compare,
XMLRPC has much more winning data representation. "Envelope" is
terrible itself. Here question, whether is necessary to have two
realizations of the RPC using XML? I think that it is not profits
integration and compatibility. It seems to me that it is necessary
to seek cooperation between developers for establishing of the
trade-off decision.

-- 
Best regards,
 Timur                            mailto:Timur at niist.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: John Stracke

References:
- Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
  - From: Ward Harold

Prev by Date: Re: www.freeprotcols.org
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re[2]: Last Call: Using XML-RPC in BEEP to Proposed Standard

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.