Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
From: Chris Evans <teknopup at digitalatoll.flnet.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:37:48 -0800
In-reply-to: <001401c27928$8f343010$0100000a@serverintranet>
Organization: http://digitalatoll.flnet.org/
Reply-to: teknopup at digitalatoll.flnet.org
Sender: owner-ietf at ietf.org

access-list 100 deny ip 207.46.230.218 0.0.0.0 12.246.56.92 0.0.0.0 gt 1
access-list 100 permit ip any any

oh well.  :)

10/21/02 9:37:42 AM, "Haren Visavadia" <haren at btopenworld.com> wrote:

>If Microsoft can not produce secure products, what chance is there of
>them producing a secure protocol?
>
>IETF is more experienced than Microsoft at producing protocols.
>
>

References:
- RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
  - From: Haren Visavadia

Prev by Date: Re: [isdf] Palladium (TCP/MS)
Next by Date: RE: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Previous by thread: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Next by thread: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.